Evaluating the effect of equipping an unloading knee orthosis with local muscle vibrators on clinical parameters, muscular activation level, and medial contact force in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Unloading knee orthosis is prescribed for people with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) to unload the damaged compartment. However, despite its benefits, wearing unloading knee orthoses in the long term may decrease knee muscle activity and have a side effect on knee OA progression rate. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether equipping an unloading knee orthosis with local muscle vibrators improves its effectiveness in improving clinical parameters, medial contact force (MCF), and muscular activation levels. METHODS: The authors performed a clinical evaluation on 14 participants (7 participants wearing vibratory unloading knee orthoses and 7 participants wearing conventional unloading knee orthoses) with medial knee OA. RESULTS: Wearing both orthoses (vibratory and conventional) for 6 weeks significantly improved ( p < 0.05) the MCF, pain, symptoms, function, and quality of life compared with the baseline assessment. Compared with the baseline assessment, the vastus lateralis muscle activation level significantly increased ( p = 0.043) in the vibratory unloading knee orthoses group. The vibratory unloading knee orthoses significantly improved the second peak MCF, vastus medialis activation level, pain, and function compared with conventional unloading knee orthoses ( p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Given the potential role of medial compartment loading in the medial knee OA progression rate, both types of unloading knee orthoses (vibratory and conventional) have a potential role in the conservative management of medial knee OA. However, equipping the unloading knee orthoses with local muscle vibrators can improve its effectiveness for clinical and biomechanical parameters and prevent the side effects of its long-term use.

Effect of equipping an unloader knee orthosis with vibrators on pain, function, stiffness, and knee adduction moment in people with knee osteoarthritis: A pilot randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Wearing unloader knee orthoses for the long term may have a side effect on knee adduction moment (KAM). RESEARCH QUESTION: This study sought to determine whether equipping an unloader knee orthosis with vibrators improves its effectiveness in pain, stiffness, function, and reducing the KAM. METHODS: The authors performed a clinical evaluation with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) questionnaire and instrumented gait analyses on 14 participants with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis in two testing sessions: before wearing the orthosis and after 6 weeks of use. RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Wearing both orthoses for 6 weeks significantly improved (p < 0.05) pain, stiffness, and function compared to the baseline assessment. There was a significantly greater reduction in the first peak KAM (p = 0.016) and KAM impulse (p = 0.008) in the vibratory unloader knee orthosis than in the conventional knee orthosis in the second session. Equipping the unloader knee orthosis with vibrators can improve its effectiveness in reducing the KAM and can prevent the side effects of its use. Furthermore, equipping the unloader knee orthosis with the vibrators did not interfere with its effectiveness on pain, stiffness, and function.

Immediate effect of textured insoles on the balance in patients with diabetic neuropathy.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Neuropathy is a common complication of diabetes that reduces balance by disrupting vision, and the sensory and vestibular systems. This is important in older adults who are more at risk of falling. Studies show that improving the sensory mechanisms through insoles can improve balance in people with balance disorders. As textured insoles have recently been considered for improving balance disorders, this study aimed to investigate the immediate effect of textured insoles on the balance of patients with diabetic neuropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 17 patients with diabetic neuropathy participated in this quasi-experimental study. The studied variables were the general balance index, posterior-anterior balance index and medial-lateral balance index, which were measured in three conditions: (i) soft textured insoles; (ii) hard textured insoles; and (iii) without textured insoles. A Biodex balance device was used for this purpose. RESULTS: In the general balance index, there was a significant difference between all the studied conditions. In the posterior-anterior balance index, there was a significant difference between without textured insole and hard textured insoles, and also soft and hard textured insoles. In the medial-lateral balance index, there was a significant difference between the hard textured insoles and without textured insoles, and also soft and hard textured insoles (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Wearing textured insoles can increase the balance in patients with diabetic neuropathy. This can be due to its effect on the sensory feedback of the soles, improving the proprioception and tactile sensors that are the main sources of balance.

A comparison of the biomechanical and clinical effects of a biaxial ankle-foot orthosis and lateral wedge insole in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare a biaxial ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) with a lateral wedge insole in terms of the biomechanical and clinical outcomes in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-over randomized design was used where 31 individuals (25 females and six males, mean age of 52.19 ± 4.12 years) with knee osteoarthritis wore each intervention for two weeks with two weeks washout period. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data and clinical outcomes were collected to evaluate the effects of each intervention on knee adduction moment (KAM), pain, stiffness, and function. RESULTS: Both orthoses significantly improved pain by 17 and 22%, function by 11 and 14%, the first peak KAM by 15.7 and 19.2%, the second peak KAM by 10.4 and 16.7%, and KAM impulse by 14.8 and 22.2%, respectively. However, the biaxial AFO significantly reduced the KAM and improved function compared to the lateral wedge insole (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study have shown that both orthoses have a potential role in the conservative management of medial knee osteoarthritis. The biaxial AFO proved statistically better at improving function and KAM; though these differences do not seem to be clinically significant.IMPLICATION FOR REHABILITATIONOrthotic interventions have been reported to be effective in the management of medial knee osteoarthritis.Lateral wedge insole and biaxial ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) are effective in the improvement of pain, function, and knee adduction moment (KAM) in people with medial knee osteoarthritis.The biaxial AFO, compared with lateral wedge insole, contributes to statistically more improvement of function and KAM. However, these differences do not seem to be clinically significant.

The effect of local muscle vibration on clinical and biomechanical parameters in people with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review.

Background: To identify and synthesize available published studies on the effect of local muscle vibration (LMV) on pain, stiffness, and function in individuals with knee OA. Methods: Five databases were searched to find relevant papers on April 29, 2020, including, PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE (Ovid), Science Citation Index, and COCHRANE Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized-controlled-trials (non-RCTs), such as interrupted time series and prospective cohort studies were included. Two independent reviewers screened articles and assessed inclusion through predefined criteria. Participants' characteristics, study design, intervention characteristics, outcomes, and main results were collected independently by 2 reviewers. The risk of bias assessment of included studies was conducted using Cochrane risk of bias tools for RCTs and non-RCTs. Results: Six studies were included: 3 RCTs and 3 non-RCTs. The risk of bias in included studies was generally moderate to high. Improvement of pain, stiffness, and function following the application of LMV were reported in all studies. Conclusion: This review revealed the promising effect of LMV on pain, stiffness, function, and knee range of motion (ROM) improvements for individuals with knee Osteoarthritis (OA). However, further well-designed studies are required to have a convincing conclusion on the effect of LMV in individuals with knee OA.

Comparison of the quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury wearing either reciprocating gait orthosis or hip knee ankle foot orthosis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The quality of life (QoL) for patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI) is lower than that for healthy individuals. The main purpose of prescribing orthoses for these individuals is to improve their mobility and QoL. The hip knee ankle foot orthosis (HKAFO) has been the conventional choice for such patients, whilst the reciprocating gait orthosis (RGO) is a more contemporary option. Although the impact of these two types of orthoses on the biomechanics of walking has been previously evaluated in patients with SCI, there has been no specific comparison of their relative effects on QoL. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP-68) QoL questionnaire's total score and its sub-scores in patients with SCIs wearing either RGOs or HKAFOs. METHODS: This study was performed on 22 participants (11 participants wearing RGOs and 11 wearing HKAFOs). QoL scores were evaluated in each group of patients using the total and sub-scores from the SIP-68 questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the total SIP-68 scores between the RGO and HKAFO groups (p = .57). However, emotional stability and emotional independence sub-scores were significantly lower for the RGO users than for the HKAFO users (p = .03 and p = .01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon this preliminary study, participants wearing RGOs or HKAFOs had similar QoL scores. However, those wearing RGOs may experience better emotional stability, communication, and emotional independence. This preliminary study does not provide definite conclusions since a large randomized control trial is required to compare the effects of these orthoses on the QoL scores in patients with SCIs.Implications for rehabilitationOur main aim in the current investigation was to shed light on the question that does the biomechanical superiority of the RGO to the HKAFO leads to better quality of life in SCI subjects who are using RGO. Regarding the fact that the primary goal of rehabilitation of people with SCI is to improve their quality of life, it seems that the more complicated newer orthosis (RGO) has no difference with the older type (HKAFO) in achieving the rehabilitation goals. More studies will in fact be necessary to find a definitive answer for this important question.According to the findings of our study, it seems to be more appropriate to prescribe RGO for male participants with higher body weight.

The effect of hydrodynamic insole on foot kinematics in individuals with flexible flatfoot: Case series using a single-subject design.

The medial longitudinal arch of the foot is a dynamic structure while walking. The mobility of this structure in people with flexible flatfoot is partially or completely absent. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an insole that was designed to retrieve the medial longitudinal arch mobility in people with flatfoot. The study was a case series using a single-subject design. This single-subject design study was based on three subjects with flexible flatfoot. This study was designed in two phases: the baseline phase and the intervention phase. Each phase included five measurement sessions that were done in 5 consecutive weeks. We used the celeration-line method to detect the significant differences between the phases. Significant differences were recorded in the walking velocity, step length, and medial longitudinal arch mobility parameters when using the hydrodynamic insole. The results of this study showed that using the hydrodynamic insole may have a positive effect on the foot kinematics and gait parameters in people with flexible flatfoot.

The Effect of Soft and Rigid Cervical Collars on Head and Neck Immobilization in Healthy Subjects.

STUDY DESIGN: Whiplash injury is a prevalent and often destructive injury of the cervical column, which can lead to serious neck pain. Many approaches have been suggested for the treatment of whiplash injury, including anti-inflammatory drugs, manipulation, supervised exercise, and cervical collars. Cervical collars are generally divided into two groups: soft and rigid collars. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to compare the effect of soft and rigid cervical collars on immobilizing head and neck motion. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Many studies have investigated the effect of collars on neck motion. Rigid collars have been shown to provide more immobilization in the sagittal and transverse planes compared with soft collars. However, according to some studies, soft and rigid collars provide the same range of motion in the frontal plane. METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy subjects aged 18-26 participated in this study. Data were collected using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and six infrared cameras. Eight markers, weighing 4.4 g and thickened 2 cm2 were used to record kinematic data. According to the normality of the data, a paired t-test was used for statistical analyses. The level of significance was set at α=0.01. RESULTS: All motion significantly decreased when subjects used soft collars (p<0.01). According to the obtained data, flexion and lateral rotation experienced the maximum (39%) and minimum (11%) immobilization in all six motions using soft collars. Rigid collars caused maximum immobilization in flexion (59%) and minimum immobilization in the lateral rotation (18%) and limited all motion much more than the soft collar. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that different cervical collars have different effects on neck motion. Rigid and soft cervical collars used in the present study limited the neck motion in both directions. Rigid collars contributed to significantly more immobilization in all directions.